Legal Opinion

Paloni v. Beebe

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1941No. 6265PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

Appellant instituted this action in the district court to recover damages for an alleged breach of warranty against liens and encumbrances contained in a deed to certain real property conveyed to him by respondents. From a judgment of no cause of action this appeal was taken.

The evidence reveals that in March, 1929, L. H. Beebe and wife entered into an agreement with Tony Paloni whereby the former agreed to convey certain real estate to the latter for the sum of $1,000

“payable $500.00' cash upon the signing of this contract and the balance of $500.00 one year from date…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ElmenTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Linn v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Russell v. RobbinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Bond v. HewittSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Simanovich v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Producers Livestock Loan Company, a Corporation v. Idaho Livestock Auction, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  2. Pacific Bond & Mortgage Co. v. RohnUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Miller v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Producers Livestock Loan Company, a Corporation v. Idaho Livestock Auction, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API