Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DiCato

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 30, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

The defendant, charged with two drug offenses, was tried in a joint trial with another, who was charged with seven drug offenses. No motion to sever was filed prior to trial or after the opening statements. In his appeal from his conviction of unlawful possession with intent to distribute marijuana (G. L. c. 94C, § 31), the defendant claims that the trial court erred: in denying his motions made during trial for relief from prejudicial joinder and for a mistrial; in admitting in evidence a statement made by his codefendant that he and the defendant were “partners”; in admitting in evidence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. MoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. BongarzoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. BestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CordeiroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. BienvenuMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. DeCastroMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API