Legal Opinion

Gaulding v. Gaulding

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 12, 1953No. Nos. 18035, 18036PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. A direct bill of exceptions to a ruling made pendente lite, which does not assign error upon any final judgment or upon a judgment which would have been final if rendered as claimed by the plaintiff in error, will not be entertained by this court. Prater v. Crawford, 143 Ga. 709 (85 S. E. 829); Cohen & Menko v. Southern Express Co., 53 Ga. 128, 133 (3); Zorn v. Lamar, 71 Ga. 80 (2); Jones v. Daniel, 106 Ga. 850 (33 S. E. 41); Ross v. Mercer, 115 Ga. 353 (41 S. E. 594); State Mutual Life & Annuity Assn. v. Kemp, 115 Ga. 355 (41 S. E. 652); Peoples Bank of Talbotton v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ross v. MercerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Johnson v. Motor Contract Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Zorn v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Prater v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Jones v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gaulding v. GauldingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. Rich's, Inc. v. DenmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API