Legal Opinion

T. B. Woods Sons Co. v. Valley Iron Works

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1909PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Equity. On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

■ ARCHBAED, District Judge.

There are two causes of action, or at least two grounds of relief, set out in the bill. One is the infringement of letters patent, and the other unfair competition in trade, in imitating the distinctive form by which the complainant’s patented article, as it is claimed, has become commercially known. The parties are both citizens of Pennsylvania, and the court, therefore, would have no jurisdiction of the charge of unfair competition, independent of the fact that it has to do with the same device as to which infringement is charged. Having acquired jurisdiction by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adam v. FolgerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  2. Globe-Wernicke Co. v. Fred Macey Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  3. Jaros Hygienic Underwear Co. v. Fleece Hygienic Underwear Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Keasby & Mattison Co. v. Philip Cary Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1901
  5. Adee v. Peck Bros. & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Electric Boat Co. v. Lake Torpedo Boat Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
  2. Schiebel Toy & Novelty Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  3. Vogue Co. v. Vogue Hat Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  4. Ludwigs v. Payson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  5. Stark v. Stark Bros. Nurseries & Orchards Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API