Legal Opinion

Korotynska v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 13, 2006No. 05-1613PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge WILLIAMS joined.

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in this case alleges that defendant fiduciary breached its duties to her and other benefits plan participants by engaging in improper claims procedures designed to deny valid claims for long-term disability benefits. She seeks equitable relief under Section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). The district court found that the form of relief requested was not available under ERISA and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Korotynska v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. Cherepinsky v. Sears Roebuck and Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API