Legal Opinion

Tri-Met, Inc. v. Lamb

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 2004No. 01-01239; A120830Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (the board) determining that claimant’s injury claim is compensable. The issue is whether claimant was injured within the course and scope of her employment. We conclude that she was and affirm.

On January 8, 2001, claimant worked a shift as a bus driver for employer, a provider of public transportation. Claimant began her shift at employer’s garage at 6:20 a.m., leaving her personal vehicle at the garage. Claimant worked until she was relieved by another driver at a stop along the bus route. The practice of relieving drivers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Halsey Shedd RFPD v. LeopardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Alltucker v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API