Legal Opinion

Alltucker v. City of Salem

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 1999No. 97-03007; CA A101436PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order upholding the City of Salem’s (city) denial of his claim. We review for errors of law, ORS 656.298(7) and ORS 183.482(8), and affirm.

Claimant is a firefighter and paramedic for the city. His monthly schedule consists of alternating shifts as either a paramedic or a firefighter. He can be assigned to any of the city’s stations. The city issues a monthly report that shows the shift schedules for the month. In addition, the city issues a daily report based on last minute changes. For this reason, employees are expected to call in each…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Iliaifar v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tri-Met, Inc. v. LambCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API