United States v. Todd David Neville
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MacBRIDE, Senior District Judge:
Todd Neville appeals the district court’s affirmance of the magistrate’s revocation of Neville’s term of supervised release and the imposition of a six month sentence of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) (Supp.1991). Neville violated the terms of his supervised release before the supervisory period expired. However, Neville argues that the district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his supervised release and sentence him to prison under § 3583 because the supervisory period had expired by the time the revocation hearing was held. Neville also claims that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McCarthy v. BronsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Paul G. SczubelekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Louis Branch v. D. UmphenourCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Dante Vargas-AmayaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.