Legal Opinion

SCHMIDT v. City of Cornelius

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1957PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

Plaintiffs above named are the owners of contiguous tracts of land lying within the city of Cornelius. Acting in reliance upon the provisions of ORS 222.810 they brought this proceeding seeking to have the lands owned by them and described in the complaint excluded from the boundaries of the city. The defendant city demurred to the complaint. We find no order thereon on the judgment roll, but the printed abstract states that it was overruled. The case was put at issue by answers and reply, and after trial of the issues by the court, the “suit” was dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs appeal.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Rose v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ladd v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State v. Port of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Foeller v. Housing Authority of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1953

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bock v. Bend School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API