Legal Opinion · Dissent
MacRae v. . Unemployment Compensation Com.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 19, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1DissentBarnhill, J.
STACY, C. J., and WINBORNE, J., concur in dissent. This is an action brought by plaintiff against defendant, under the N.C. Workmen's Compensation Act (Laws 1929, ch. 120; N.C. Code, 1939 [Michie], ch. 133-A).
The hearing Commissioner found certain facts and made an award as follows:
"The Commissioner finds as a fact from the evidence and admissions that both the plaintiff and the defendant are bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workmen's Compensation Act, the defendant having five or more employees; and that the defendant is both a governmental and State Agency; and that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Barron v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Matter of Connelly v. Hunt Furniture Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Chambers v. . Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Blalock v. ROBERTS COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Edwards v. . Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Gabriel v. Town of NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Edwards v. Piedmont Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.