Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Ormet Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 19, 2002No. C2-02-120Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SARGUS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. # 2). Plaintiffs assert state law claims for misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, intentional infliction of emotional distress, loss of survivorship interest in retirement benefits and loss of consortium. Defendant claims, however, that although styled as claims for relief under state law, Plaintiffs’ allegations amount to a claim for breach of duty by fiduciary of a plan governed by the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API