Legal Opinion
Faulstich v. Ladd
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 27, 1963No. Civ. A. Nos. 3919-61 and 3920-61PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Judge.
Both of the above-entitled actions were consolidated by reason of posing substantially the same issues. Both actions were instituted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145 to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to issue patents to plaintiff upon certain claims of her applications Serial No. 595,-733 filed July 3, 1956, and Serial No. 609,385 filed September 12, 1956, both of which are entitled “Glass For Technical And Optical Purposes”.
Both applications and all of the claims are limited to optical glass compositions said to possess valuable and advantageous optical properties which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of Constantin ChilowskyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Stauffer Chemical Co. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
3Cited by3 opinions
- Faulstich v. LaddCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Application of Francis J. Honn and Willard M. SimsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Marga Faulstich v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964