Legal Opinion

Faulstich v. Ladd

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 15, 1964No. Nos. 18153, 18154PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

These cases came on to be heard on the record on appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 218 F.Supp. 830, and were argued by counsel.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court on appeal in these cases is hereby affirmed without prejudice to the reopening of the proceedings before the Patent Office, through any means available, for the purpose of allowing appellant the opportunity to amplify her applications for patents.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Faulstich v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Milton M. Levin v. Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. Clifford Jones v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, Judge of the United States District Court for Thedistrict of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. Milton M. Levin v. Ramsey Clark, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  4. Jesse B. Manbeck v. Gerald S. OstrowskiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Farnsworth v. SteinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API