Legal Opinion

Daigle v. STULC

District Court, D. Maine

Decided June 27, 2011No. 1:09-cv-00353PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.

In an action by a nurse against a hospital alleging a hostile work environment under Title VII and the Maine Human Rights Act, and retaliation under Title VII, the Maine Human Rights Act and the Maine Whistleblower’s Protection Act, the hospital moves for summary judgment. The Court concludes that summary judgment is appropriate as to the hostile work environment claims because the hospital took the nurse’s sexual harassment complaints seriously and acted promptly and appropriately. The Court concludes that summary…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Capalbo v. Kris-Way Truck Leasing, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2011
  2. Stark v. Hartt Transportation Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2014
  3. Cote v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2016
  4. Porietis v. Tradesmen International, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API