Legal Opinion
Porietis v. Tradesmen International, LLC
District Court, D. Maine
Decided January 3, 2017No. Docket no. 2:16-cv-00049-GZSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
George Z. Singal, United States District Judge
Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29). As explained herein, the Court DENIES both motions.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
Generally, a party is entitled to summary judgment if, on the record before the Court, it appears “that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). “[Tjhe mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Higgins v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Carmen Nereida-Gonzalez v. Cirilo Tirado-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- R.N. b/n/f of P.N. and R.N. Individually v. RoganDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017