Legal Opinion

State Planters Bank & Tr Co. of Richmond, VA v. Fifth-Third Union Tr Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1937No. 5122PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROSS, J.

This is an action to recover the amount of a check. The appellee — plaintiff—was the drawer drawee of the check. The appellant — defendant— was the bank to whom appellee had paid the amount of the check upon presentment for payment, having received the same from a correspondent hank, to whom it had been transmitted by the paying bank, the indorsements of the payees having been forged.

At the conclusion of the evidence of ap pellee the appellant made a motion for an instructed verdict, reserving the right to go to the jury in the event the motion was overruled. The court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Espy v. Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. White v. . Continental National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Dedham National Bank v. Everett National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. American Exchange National Bank v. Yorkville BankNew York Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Haiman Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Central Bank and Trust Company v. General Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Edgecombe Bonded Warehouse Co. v. Security National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Butler Produce & Canning Co. v. Edgerton State BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API