Legal Opinion

State, Department of Motor Vehicles v. Bremer

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1997No. 27206, 28680PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

FACTS

DMV v. Bremer

On June 23, 1993, Nevada Highway Patrol Trooper Eric Barros (“Barros”) initiated a traffic stop after observing Sharon Bremer’s failure to maintain a travel lane. Barros detected a moderate odor of alcohol on Bremer’s breath and inquired if she had been drinking, to which she replied that she had consumed three glasses of wine. Bremer then consented to and failed field sobriety and preliminary breath tests.

After placing Bremer under arrest, Barros recited her Miranda warnings and her rights and obligations under the Nevada Implied Consent Law. Bremer then consented to…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State, Department of Motor Vehicles v. VezerisNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Roberts v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Nevada Industrial Commission v. ReeseNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Santillanes v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. HallNevada Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Buckwalter v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Weaver v. State, Department of Motor VehiclesNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Derosa v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bransford v. State Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Cramer v. State, Department of Motor VehiclesNevada Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API