Legal Opinion

Buckwalter v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2010No. 55133PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Pickering, J.:

This original writ proceeding asks us to decide whether a medical expert’s declaration under penalty of perjury as provided in NRS 53.045 can satisfy the affidavit requirement stated in NRS 41A.071. We agree with the district court that it can and therefore deny writ relief.

I

This is a medical malpractice action. The plaintiffs supported their complaint with the expert proof NRS 41A.071 requires but did so by declaration rather than affidavit. The defendants moved to dismiss on the grounds that NRS 41A.071 requires an “affidavit” and says nothing about…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State, Department of Motor Vehicles v. BremerNevada Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. MountainView Hospital, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Otak Nevada, Llc v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Friedman v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Freeman Expositions, LLC v. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Einhorn v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPNevada Supreme Court · 2012

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API