Legal Opinion

King v. Neese

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1951No. 750PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EeviN, J".

Tbe trial judge based bis judgment on tbe doctrine of res judicata, wbicb may be epitomized for tbe purpose of tbis particular appeal in these words:

Where a second action or proceeding is between tbe same parties as a first action or proceeding, tbe judgment in tbe former action or proceeding is conclusive in tbe latter not only as to all matters actually litigated and determined, but also as to all matters wbicb could properly have been litigated and determined in tbe former action or proceeding. Distributing Company v. Carraway, 196 N.C. 58, 144 S.E. 535; Moore v. Harkins, 179…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Tuttle v. . HarrillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Southern Distributing Co. v. CarrawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Ludwick v. . PennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Moore v. . HarkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Stansel v. McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Humphrey v. FaisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Worthington v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Wilson v. HoyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API