Ludwick v. . Penny
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendants from Daniels, J., at June Term, 1911, of GtFILFORD. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice Walker.
1DissentBrown, J.
The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr.Justice Walker. Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for unlawfully and maliciously suing out process and levying upon plaintiff's property, thereby breaking up and destroying their business. (107) Defendant had previously sued the plaintiffs for the recovery had seized the same. That suit was decided in favor of the defendants, for the reason hereinafter stated. The defendant held a note, and a mortgage on the property to secure the same, which was executed by one Thomas to Penny. The property was afterwards…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kendall v. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Tyler v. . CapehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Voorhees v. Porter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Thompson v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Schaefer v. O. K. Tool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Johnston-Crews Co. v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Carpenter, Baggott & Co. v. HanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Melton v. RickmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.