Legal Opinion

Powell v. Barrett

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 4, 2008No. 05-16734PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARNES, Circuit Judge:

We granted rehearing en banc to decide whether a policy or practice of strip searching all arrestees as part of the process of booking them into the general population of a detention facility, even without reasonable suspicion to believe that they may be concealing contraband, is constitutionally permissible. We answer that question in the affirmative, at least where the strip search is no more intrusive than the one the Supreme Court upheld in Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979).

I

The facts and procedural history of this entire case are…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of BurlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Bull v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. T.S. Ex Rel. J.S. v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. Florence v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Jimenez v. Wood CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API