Courson v. State

1. The demurrer to the indictment was properly overruled. Davis v. State, 27 Ga. App. 195 (107 S. E. 883) ; French v. State, 4 Ga. App. 462 (61 S. E. 836).

2. “A ground of a motion for a new trial, complaining of the court’s ruling upon the admissibility of specified testimony, which does not state the name of the witness whose testimony was admitted or excluded, is too incomplete to be considered. Hunter v. State, 148 Ga. 566 (97 S. E. 523) ; Adams v. State, 22 Ga. App. 252 (95 S. E. 877), and citations.” Palmer v. State, 28 Ga. App. 567 (112 S. E. 154). Under this ruling special grounds 1…