Legal Opinion

Hennington v. Valuch

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in entering judgment notwithstanding the verdict for respondent. A judgment notwithstanding the verdict admits the findings of the verdict to be true, but grants judgment on grounds other than decided by the jury. It is undisputed that the lateral from the Hen-nington building was not connected to the city’s sewer as specifically called for by the contract. Indeed appellant admitted in his answer that “sewer connections were made to an abandoned sewer not in operation.” Appellant defended the action on the ground that,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shumway v. Milwaukee Athletic ClubWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kolpin v. Pioneer Power & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Herro v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Toulon v. NagleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Wiggins Construction Co. v. Joint School District No. 3Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API