Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration Between Republique Francaise & Cellosilk Manufacturing Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 8, 1955PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Conway, Ch. J.
In October, 1945, the respondent, Bepublique Francaise (hereinafter designated Bepublique), entered into a contract with the Cellosilk Manufacturing Company (hereinafter called Cellosilk) for the purchase of $512,100 worth of a glass substitute, to be delivered F.A.S. Port of New York, in six installments, the last of which was due in March, 1946. Among the “ General Terms and Conditions ” of the contract there was a provision that the warranty given by the seller “ shall expire not sooner than at the end of one year from the date of receipt by us [Bepublique] of the material ”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Forty-One Thirty-Six Wilcox Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Grover & Baker Sewing MacHine Co. v. RadcliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- People v. One 1941 Chrysler SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- De Dood v. Pullman Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Battle v. General Cellulose Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Beckman v. Greentree Securities, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Pacific Mills v. Hillman GarmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Matter of New Brunswick Theol. Seminary v. Van DykeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- In re the Arbitration between Terminal Auxiliar Maritima, S. A. & Cocotos Steamship Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.