Legal Opinion

Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. Fowler

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*574CATES, Judge.

This appeal was submitted on oral argument January 18, 1966.

After a layoff, Mrs. Fowler thought that her employer had reinstated her hospital service policy and that the employer was remitting her premiums. She recovered $254.70 for breach of the policy.

Blue Cross defended on the theory that it had never received the premiums.

I

Mrs. Fowler became ill February 6, 1964. She incurred hospital and medical expense •of more than $254.70, of which Blue Cross-Blue Shield paid nothing.

She had been issued Blue Cross-Blue Shield’s contract for hospital, surgical, medical benefits (effective…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. New Amsterdam CasualtySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. All States Life Ins. Co. v. TillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Rodgers v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Scheuer v. BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Hill v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Abbiati v. Buttura & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  2. Ragsdale v. Life Ins. Co. of N. AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. BroaddrickCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. FowlerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API