Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. Fowler
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*574CATES, Judge.
This appeal was submitted on oral argument January 18, 1966.
After a layoff, Mrs. Fowler thought that her employer had reinstated her hospital service policy and that the employer was remitting her premiums. She recovered $254.70 for breach of the policy.
Blue Cross defended on the theory that it had never received the premiums.
I
Mrs. Fowler became ill February 6, 1964. She incurred hospital and medical expense •of more than $254.70, of which Blue Cross-Blue Shield paid nothing.
She had been issued Blue Cross-Blue Shield’s contract for hospital, surgical, medical benefits (effective…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. New Amsterdam CasualtySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- All States Life Ins. Co. v. TillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Rodgers v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Scheuer v. BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Hill v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Abbiati v. Buttura & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Ragsdale v. Life Ins. Co. of N. AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. BroaddrickCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. FowlerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.