Legal Opinion

Yates v. Allied International Credit Corp.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 29, 2008No. 3:06-cr-01458PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS II THROUGH V OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Doc. # 9]

ROGER T. BENITEZ, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Douglas Yates (“Plaintiff’ or “Yates”) alleges violations of the California and federal fair debt collection laws, and a number of factually related state law claims. Defendant Allied International Credit Corporation (“Defendant” or “Allied”) 1 moves to dismiss Claims II through V in the First Amended Complaint as privileged under California Civil Code § 47(b). Plaintiff opposes the motion. The Court conducted oral…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Komarova v. National Credit Acceptance, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Welker v. Law Office of HorwitzDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2009
  3. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004
  4. Gross v. Judge CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API