Yates v. Allied International Credit Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS II THROUGH V OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
[Doc. # 9]
ROGER T. BENITEZ, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Douglas Yates (“Plaintiff’ or “Yates”) alleges violations of the California and federal fair debt collection laws, and a number of factually related state law claims. Defendant Allied International Credit Corporation (“Defendant” or “Allied”) 1 moves to dismiss Claims II through V in the First Amended Complaint as privileged under California Civil Code § 47(b). Plaintiff opposes the motion. The Court conducted oral…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Komarova v. National Credit Acceptance, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Welker v. Law Office of HorwitzDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2009
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004
- Gross v. Judge CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013