Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mackill

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1936No. Appeal, No. 182Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtpeld, J.,

The defendant, James Mackill, holder of a Retailer’s Malt Liquor License, executed a bond, with the Seaboard Surety Company as Surety, in favor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the penal sum of $1,000. This bond was given pursuant to the requirements of the Malt Liquor License Law of 1933. On or about March 23, 1934, Mackill, having been indicted for violations of the Malt Liquor License Law of 1933, was found guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of three hundred ($300) dollars and costs, or to serve six months in jail in default thereof. Four days later Mackill…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Commonwealth v. J. & A. Moeschlin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Commonwealth v. Eclipse Literary & Social ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Lightner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API