Vancura v. Katris
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBRIDE
After a bench trial, the circuit court found defendant Kinko’s, Inc. (Kinko’s), liable for damages resulting from its employee’s notarization of a forged signature on a mortgage assignment. Kinko’s1 seeks reversal, contending the court misconstrued section 7 — 102 of the Illinois Notary Public Act (5 ILCS 312/7 — 102 (West 1996)) (Act) regarding employer liability and further erred by imposing liability under the common law for negligent training and supervision. This is a case of first impression regarding an employer’s liability under the Act for a notary’s “official misconduct.” 5 ILCS…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bagent v. Blessing Care Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Van Horne v. MullerIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- Schatz v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1972
- Calloway v. KinkelaarIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Doe v. CoeIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
- Waugh v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Zahl v. KrupaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Waugh v. MORGAN STANLEY AND CO., INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Doe v. CoeIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.