Legal Opinion

Vancura v. Katris

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 26, 2008No. 1-06-2750PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBRIDE

After a bench trial, the circuit court found defendant Kinko’s, Inc. (Kinko’s), liable for damages resulting from its employee’s notarization of a forged signature on a mortgage assignment. Kinko’s1 seeks reversal, contending the court misconstrued section 7 — 102 of the Illinois Notary Public Act (5 ILCS 312/7 — 102 (West 1996)) (Act) regarding employer liability and further erred by imposing liability under the common law for negligent training and supervision. This is a case of first impression regarding an employer’s liability under the Act for a notary’s “official misconduct.” 5 ILCS…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bagent v. Blessing Care Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Van Horne v. MullerIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Schatz v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Calloway v. KinkelaarIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Doe v. CoeIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Waugh v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. Zahl v. KrupaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Waugh v. MORGAN STANLEY AND CO., INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Doe v. CoeIllinois Supreme Court · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API