Legal Opinion

Bruton v. Villoria

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1956No. Civ. 21095PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

In this action of Mary Bruton against Charles Joseph Villoría et al., for the recovery of damages sustained as a result of injuries received in a collision of automobiles, plaintiff appeals from a judgment upon verdict in favor of the defendants.

The car in which plaintiff was riding belonged to her husband who was driving, with plaintiff and two children of the parties riding with him.

The answer, in addition to denials, pleaded the defense of negligence on the part of Mr. Bruton in the operation of the car which was alleged to have been the direct and proximate cause of a collision between…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. McFadden v. Santa Ana, Orange, & Tustin Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. In Re Estate of NiccollsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. FosterIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Choate v. RansomNevada Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Estate of SimoniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Ferguson v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API