Legal Opinion
California Ex Rel. Lockyer v. County of Santa Cruz
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 21, 2006No. C-05-04708 RMWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT; GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
[Re Docket Nos. 17, 19, 23, 24, 38, 40]
WHYTE, District Judge.
Defendants County of Santa Cruz and Gail Pellerin move to dismiss both causes of action against them. Plaintiff Bill Lock-yer, in his capacity as Attorney General of California, moves to remand to state court only his first cause of action, for violation of California Elections Code § 11280. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies the defendants’ motion to dismiss in part and grants the plaintiffs motion to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Robert E. Weinreich v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- State v. Altus Finance, S.A.California Supreme Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garcia Ex Rel. Marin v. Clovis Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Regenicin, Inc. v. Lonza Walkersville, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014