Legal Opinion
Ouelette v. Miller
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 5, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.
On exceptions by defendant to the overruling of a general demurrer to the declaration in the plaintiff’s writ.
The plaintiff received personal injuries from a fall on the sidewalk in front of premises owned by one of the defendants and occupied by the other..
The first count in the declaration is concededly bad and it is unnecessary to consider it.
The second count sets forth: “That the plaintiff was on the second day of January, A. D. 1935, a pedestrian on the sidewalk on the westerly side of Water Street in said Augusta, which said sidewalk abutted on property and premises owned by the said…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chickering v. Lincoln County Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
- Dahlin v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Neallus v. Hutchinson Amusement Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
- Brown v. RhoadesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
- Kennedy v. MorganSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Isaacson v. Husson CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Rich v. RosenshineWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
- Schaefer v. LenahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Reynolds v. W. H. Hinman Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
- Summit Realty, Inc. v. GipeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.