Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Ohtsu Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 7, 1999No. Civ.A. AMD 98-1099PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently pending is defendants’ motion to exclude plaintiffs’ amended expert witness report and testing, the plaintiffs’ opposition, and the defendants’ reply. (Paper nos. 14, 15 and 17, respectively). This case has been referred to me for resolution of discovery disputes. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Local Rule 301.5.a. I have considered the parties’ submissions, as well as additional materials requested in a letter of April 26, 1999. 1 No hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons stated below, the defendants’ motion is denied.
BA…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Vodusek v. Bayliner Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Reliance Insurance v. The Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Paddack v. Dave Christensen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Electric Motor Supply, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Gallagher Ex Rel. National Packaging Solutions Group Trust v. Southern Source Packaging, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Akeva LLC v. Mizuno Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002
- Sharpe v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Kleban v. Eghrari-SabetCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.