Legal Opinion
McLaren Performance Technologies, Inc. v. Dana Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 5, 2000No. CIV. 98-40318PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant Dana Corporation’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed August 23, 2000 and Plaintiff McLaren Performance Technologies, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement, Validity, and Enforceability filed on August 30, 2000. For reasons stated below, this Court will grant Defendant’s motion and deny Plaintiffs motion as moot.
Factual and Procedural Background
Plaintiff McLaren…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amphion, Inc. v. Buckeye Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Ramik v. Darling International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Garrish v. United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Hill v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Sparks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.