Oliver v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Geonard Oliver appeals from the circuit court's dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding in which he was found guilty of making a threat and was sanctioned by the loss of six months' earned good-time credit. Oliver argues that the disciplinary proceeding failed to comport with due-process requirements because, he says, the finding of guilt was based solely on hearsay. Because Oliver was sanctioned with the loss of earned good-time credit, it is necessary to examine his due-process claim. Washington v. State,690 So.2d 539, 540…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte FloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Heidelburg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Pearsall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Pearsall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McFadden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Baskin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Bryant v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Byers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Cannady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006