Legal Opinion

Oliver v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 28, 2000No. CR-99-0928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Geonard Oliver appeals from the circuit court's dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding in which he was found guilty of making a threat and was sanctioned by the loss of six months' earned good-time credit. Oliver argues that the disciplinary proceeding failed to comport with due-process requirements because, he says, the finding of guilt was based solely on hearsay. Because Oliver was sanctioned with the loss of earned good-time credit, it is necessary to examine his due-process claim. Washington v. State,690 So.2d 539, 540…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ex Parte FloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Heidelburg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Pearsall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Pearsall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McFadden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  2. Baskin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Bryant v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Byers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  5. Cannady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API