Legal Opinion
Byers v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided January 31, 2003No. CR-02-0135PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, Judge.
Reginald Byers appeals the circuit court’s summary denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, wherein he alleged that he was denied due process in a prison disciplinary proceeding. He was found guilty in the disciplinary proceeding of violating Rule No. 41 in Annex A to the Alabama Department of Corrections, Administrative Regulation No. 403 (making false statements or charges), and Rule No. 91 in Annex A to the Alabama Department of Corrections, Administrative Regulation No. 403 (conspiracy to commit a violation of departmental or institutional rules). Byers was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte FloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Ex Parte BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Heidelburg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bryant v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010