Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Floyd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 11, 1984No. 82-1143PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals, 434 So.2d 871, to review that court's affirmance, without opinion, of the trial court's dismissal of the petition for habeas corpus of Floyd, who sought to reverse a prison disciplinary board ruling that deprived him of "good time" benefits. We reverse.

The dispositive issue is whether the due process requirements that a prisoner in a disciplinary hearing, the outcome of which could result in revocation of "good time" benefits, must be given written notice in advance (not less than twenty-four hours) of the charges against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Vaughan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Sheats v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. Jacobs v. StephensSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Ex Parte LockettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Chaverst v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API