Legal Opinion
Boogaard v. National Hockey League
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 29, 2016No. 13 C 4846PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Gary Scott Feinerman, United States District Judge
The personal representatives of Derek Boogaard’s estate (for ease of exposition, the court will treat Boogaard himself as the plaintiff) brought this suit against the National Hockey League and its Board of Governors and Commissioner (collectively, “NHL”), alleging tort claims connected with Boogaard’s death. Docs. 1-1, 62. Earlier in the case, the court denied Boo-gaard’s motion to remand the suit to state court. Docs. 37-38 (reported at 20 F.Supp.3d 650 (N.D. Ill. 2014)). After discovery, the court granted summary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- General Electric Capital Corporation v. Lease Resolution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Maddox v. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Iseberg v. GrossIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Armando Villa v. City of Chicago, Jane Byrne and Carol Witherell-NiecCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boogaard v. National Hockey LeagueDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Carcillo v. National Hockey LeagueDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Montador v. National Hockey LeagueDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022