Legal Opinion

Boogaard v. National Hockey League

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 5, 2017No. 13 C 4846PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge

Len and Joanne Boogaard, the personal representatives of the estate of Derek Boogaard, bring this suit against the National Hockey League and its Board of Governors and Commissioner (collectively, “NHL”), alleging tort claims connected with Boogaard’s death. Docs. 1-1, 62, 174. (For ease of reference, and except where context requires otherwise, the court will refer to Plaintiffs as “Boogaard.”) As matters now stand, Counts V-XII of the second amended complaint have been dismissed, and Counts I-IV remain in the case.…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Doe v. Kane Cnty.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Lifeworks Tech. Grp. LLC v. Walgreen Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Bordelais v. KuhnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  4. Carcillo v. National Hockey LeagueDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  5. Doe I v. Kane CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API