Aikins v. Kingsbury
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME. COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. The case is stated in the opinion:
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clarke
On June 3, 1869, the State of California sold to Charles A. B. Brackett three hundred and twenty acres of school land, and delivered to him a “certificate of purchase”for it. Twenty- per cent, of the purchase money was payable at the time of the purchase and the remainder “within one year after the passage of any. act of the Legislature requiring such payment, or before, if desired by the purchaser.”
The unpaid purchase money was to bear interest at the rate of ten .per cent, per annum, payable in advance.
The purchaser paid interest to January 1, 1873, and nothing further for thirty-eight…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Plymouth Coal Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Tyler v. Judges of the Court of RegistrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Lehon v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Wilson v. StandeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Waggoner v. FlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
3Cited by28 opinions
- City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Carlos Herrera, Victor Hugo Herrera, and Felipe Santiago Herrera, A/k/a"chiquito"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Semke v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Motor Vehicle CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- City of Providence v. MoultonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1932
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.