Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Judges of the Court of Registration

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 17, 1900No. 213PublishedCited by 164 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. This was a petition by Tyler uO the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts for a writ of prohibition to be directed to the Judges of the Court of Registration to prohibit them from further proceeding under what is known as the Torrens Act in the registration of a certain parcel of land described in the application, or in the determination of the boundary between such parcel of land and land of…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. This was a petition by Tyler uO the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts for a writ of prohibition to be directed to the Judges of the Court of Registration to prohibit them from further proceeding under what is known as the Torrens Act in the registration of a certain parcel of land described in the application, or in the determination of the boundary between such parcel of land and land of petitioner. The petition alleged in substance that David E. Gould and George H. Jones, on December 22, 1898, applied to the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

The prime object of all litigation is to establish a right asserted by the plaintiff or to sustain a defence set up by the party pursued. Save in a few instances where, by statute or the settled practice of the. courts, the plaintiff is permitted to sue for the benefit of another, he is bound to show an interest in the suit personal to himself, and even in a proceeding which he prosecutes for the benefit of the public, as, for example, in cases of nuisance, he must generally aver an injury peculiar to himself, as distinguished from the great body of his fellow citizens.

The very first general…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Lord v. VeazieSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  5. Luxton v. North River Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by164 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API