Legal Opinion

Pembroke Park Lakes, Inc. v. High Ridge Water Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 26, 1966No. 65-1037PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

The plaintiff corporation, Pembroke Park Lakes, Inc., seeks review, by this interlocutory appeal, of an order enforcing discovery and a subpoena duces tecum against its president and its secretary in a discovery proceeding. The cause came on before the chancellor upon defendant, High Ridge Water Company’s motion pursuant to Rule 1.31, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure (1962 Rev.), 30 F.S.A., to compel witness Maurice Castellano (the President) to answer questions on oral examination, and upon the further motion of the defendant pursuant to Rule 1.31 and Rule 1.34(e),1 Florida…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Charles Sales Corp. v. RovengerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Shepherd v. CastleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
  3. Korman v. NobileDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1960
  4. McLean v. Prudential Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1965
  5. Brooker v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ace Electric Supply Co. v. Terra Nova Electric, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  2. In re Anchor Mobile Home Movers, Inc.Florida Public Service Commission · 1969
  3. Southern Mill Creek Products Co. v. Delta Chemical Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API