State v. McCord
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
On this appeal, we address the trial court’s ruling after a Batson hearing. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to find that the State engaged in intentional racial discrimination when exercising its peremptory challenges to strike two prospective jurors. We affirm.
On 5 December 2000, this Court addressed defendant’s appeal of judgments finding him guilty of first-degree murder, first-degree rape, first-degree kidnapping, robbery with a firearm, and first-degree burglary. The detailed facts of this case are set out in that opinion. See State v. McCord, 140 N.C.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HeadenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. SalinasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. McCordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.