Legal Opinion

Miao v. LaCampagne

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 19, 2025No. 3:25-cv-06784Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ZHUO QUAN MIAO, Case No. 25-cv-06784-CRB 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP MOTION; 10 v. DENYING MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING 11 DANIELLE LACAMPAGNE, et al., ORDER; ABSTAINING UNDER COLORADO RIVER DOCTRINE 12 Defendants. 13 Plaintiff Zhou Quan Miao filed a pro se complaint and application to proceed in 14 forma pauperis. See Compl. (dkt. 1); IFP App. (dkt. 2). 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) authorizes 15 the Court to permit a plaintiff to file a federal lawsuit without prepayment of fees or 16 security so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Kawecki Ex Rel. Marlowe v. County of MacOmbDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API