Legal Opinion
United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 27, 1996No. Crim. Action 91-0655 (JHG)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETITION OF BANQUE INDOSUEZ
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Presently pending is the United States’ Motion to Dismiss (“Motion to Dismiss”) the Claim and Petition for Remission of $263,-250.00 by Banque Indosuez as a Third Party Claimant Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(i) (“L-Claim”). The sole ground of the Motion to Dismiss is lack of timeliness.
For the reasons expressed below, the Motion to Dismiss will be denied. Should the United States or the Courb-Appointed Fiduciaries oppose the L-Claim on the merits, they shall file their briefs in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- William Hohri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Hughes v. AbellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Pettaway v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.