State v. Bennington
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
William Bennington appeals his convictions and sentences, raising three issues. First, he argues his right to confront his accuser was violated when the trial court admitted into evidence testimony of a bank employee and a sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) regarding statements made to them by the victim, who died before the trial. Bennington also argues his convictions must be reversed because the prosecutor committed misconduct by violating an order in limine and by making improper comments during closing argument. Finally, he argues…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. RaskieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. LogsdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. PeppersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.