Legal Opinion
PAXI, LLC v. Shiseido Americas Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 8, 2009No. 09 Civ. 4739 (CM)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
McMAHON, District Judge:
On June 22, 2009, plaintiff Paxi LLC applied for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, against defendants Shiseido Americas Corporation and Shiseido Cosmetics (America) Ltd. (collectively, Shiseido). 1 In the instant action, Paxi has asserted claims for breach of contract, “detrimental reliance” and tortious interference with contractual relations against the defendants. Only Shiseido has appeared.
Paxi asks that Shiseido be enjoined from violating the May 16,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eternity Global Master Fund Limited v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York and Jpmorgan Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Paul Jolly v. Thomas Coughlin, Robert Greifinger, John P. Keane, C. Greiner, S. KapoorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- 511 West 232nd Owners Corp. v. Jennifer Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Dalton v. Educational Testing ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Emmons v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Serdarevic v. Centex Homes, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Bader v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. Cellco PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Kortright Capital Partners LP v. Investcorp Investment Advisers Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.