Legal Opinion

United States v. Russ

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 18, 2001No. 01-3018PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Damien Tremont Russ appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

In 2000, a jury convicted Russ of possessing with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced Russ to 120 months of imprisonment and eight years of supervised release, and the court imposed a $100 special assessment. In this timely appeal, Russ’s counsel has…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Chauncy Adam Tucker (95-1160) Calvin Miller, Jr. (95-1187) and Anthony Darrick McCoy (95-1220)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Erina S. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Scott PayneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. GolidayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. David PayneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. Russ v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API