Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Chauncy Adam Tucker (95-1160) Calvin Miller, Jr. (95-1187) and Anthony Darrick McCoy (95-1220)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 25, 1996No. 95-1160, 95-1187 and 95-1220PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Chauncy Adam Tucker, Calvin Miller, Jr., and Anthony Darriek McCoy challenge their convictions and sentences arising from their participation in a drug trafficking conspiracy. We find their constitutional claims meritless but reverse those convictions that have to do with using or carrying a firearm during a drug trafficking crime and remand for resentencing on firearm possession and quantity issues.

I. Background

A federal grand jury in Michigan indicted Robert Maurice Hampton, Jr., and appellants Chauncy Adam Tucker, Calvin Miller, Jr., and Anthony Darriek…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Burt Lancaster v. Stanley Adams, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. State v. StoutTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Jimmy Ray Valentine (04-2116) Kenneth Jerome Valentine (05-1877) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Samuel Demont BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API