Legal Opinion

Cape Cod Steamship Co. v. Selectmen of Provincetown

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1936PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

Material facts disclosed by the agreed statement of facts are these: For the past thirty years, during the summer season, the corporate petitioner has operated *66passenger steamships between Boston and Provincetown, and for the past twenty-five years it has berthed its steamships at “Town Wharf,” now so called, in Provincetown. There is at that town no other wharf with sufficient depth of water to dock these vessels. The individual petitioners are citizens and taxpayers in Provincetown. The individual respondents are the selectmen of that town. By St. 1928, c. 253, the town was authorized to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Meriwether v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Attorney General v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Williams v. . GallatinNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Brewster v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Brooks v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Moore v. Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Kaplan v. BowkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Whittemore v. Town Clerk of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Sunderland v. Building Inspector of North AndoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API