Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State Bar of California

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1986No. L.A. No. 32094PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review the findings and recommendations of the State Bar concerning petitioner, Floyd Franklin.

The hearing panel recommended that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for five years, that execution of the suspension be stayed, and that he be placed on probation for five years. As a condition of probation, the hearing panel recommended that petitioner be required to notify his clients that he is on probation. The review department, by a vote of eight to three, recommended that petitioner be suspended for only one year, that execution of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re BogartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Jackson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franklin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Rosenthal v. Justices of the Supreme Court of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Rosenthal v. Justices Of The Supreme Court Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API